Viscount Class Star Defender
After seeing The Last Jedi and realizing that I both like and dislike the 'new' MC-85 Mon Calamari Star Cruiser Raddus, I've decided to do my own take on it and redesign the class while incorporating the overall hull shape of the Viscount-class Star Defender from EU/Legends. Mar 05, 2019 Viscount-class Star Defender (Star Wars Legends Continuity) vs Wraith Hive Ship (Stargate Atlantis) Both ships are in an empty void within sensor range of one another. Neither ship has prior knowledge of the other's capabilities. Win condition is complete destruction of the other ship. Viscount Class Star Defender Manufacturer Mon Calamari Shipyards Class Star Defender Section Header Length 17,500 Meters Width 10,000 Meters Height/Depth 8,000 Meters MGLT 70 MGLT Hyperspace Rating Class 1 Shielding 330,000 SBD380,000 SBD (backup shielding)( it can go much higher because of the.
Find a flair you like, click it, and send the message it brings you to exactly as-is. Within a minute, will have assigned you your shiny new flair.All posts must be flaired. Your post will get automatically removed if it is not flaired.
For a guide on flairing and how to filter out flairs you don't like, click.If you do not properly flair your post, or reply incorrectly to a post because you didn't know the difference between 'Battle' and 'Scan-Battle', you agree to forfeit to us your soul in perpetuity or another soul of equal or greater value.Unsure of a good way to make your fight more interesting than just 'X Character vs. Y Character'? Check out our for a few suggestions on how you can structure your battle with additional conditions and formatting to make it more interesting.General Rules -.Be nice. Do not be insulting or derogatory towards others under any circumstances, and don't resort to ad hominem attacks. Failure to treat your fellow users with respect can lead to a warning or ban.Don't downvote. We encourage the upvoting of all relevant content and have a wide definition of what's acceptable. Downvoting will never be allowed on this sub.You're allowed to repost but look to your left first.
If you see a large number of posts about a character, try someone else. If you're going to repost try to broaden or change the discussion to keep it fresh. Use your best judgment.Meta posts, multi-part tournaments, and other non-conventional posts require mod approval. Send us a message we'd love to help you with your thread.If asked, you must provide evidence for your claims or drop the argument.Disruptive gimmick accounts will be first warned then removed.Posts must be some form of battle, competition, or challenge or they are considered off-topic/META and should go in our weekly off-topic discussion posts or the Meta Monday thread.The following post types and comments have been deemed low-quality by the community and may be removed. For more information.Post Rules.Overly broad, vague or opinion-reliant posts. This now includes 'You vs' posts as of; details on why are.
Viscount Class Star Defender Star Wars Fanon
Battles must include at least one specific combatant and include the series/version of the character(s) in the title or post body (For example; Thor vs. Wonder Woman must be titled like 'Thor (Marvel 616) vs. Wonder Woman (DC Post-Crisis)').Posts with no details or specifications whatsoever.Copy-pasta, Circlejerk or Meme derivative posts. It's interesting in that their armament layouts are nearly identical - the Executor-class carries more concussion missile tubes, but the Viscount-class carries many more ion cannon. This may reflect the fact that the Executor was never expected to engage similarly-sized vessels in large numbers and could make better use of missiles capable of tracking smaller (though still cruiser-sized) hulls. The Viscount-class, on the other hand, was built to engage other dreadnoughts and needed more shield-breaking capability.My general suspicion is that the Viscount is the sturdier hull.
It's simply newer and was explicitly built to counter the threat posed by large dreadnoughts like the Executor; the shields are explicitly noted as making use of Mon Calamari shielding technology.Starfighter-wise, the Viscount allegedly carries far fewer ('hundreds') but has room for smaller escort vessels to be carried aboard. The Executor, however, has much more room for starfighters (its escort was presumably intended to make it on its own). Discounting the escort vessels, the Executor's starfighter wing is superior; including it, the Viscount probably has the better layout. Since 144 is noted as the 'minimum', I'd suggest that number is the hull's - the Starfighters automatically assigned by Imperial doctrine to a dreadnought-type hull.
For logistics and organization purposes, further starfighters would be noted as independent units on attachment to an Executor-class.This is probably because dreadnoughts were so rare compared to the legions of smaller hulls that it was easier to note attachment of independent starfighter wings than invent an entirely unique arrangement for the Executors. Viscounts win both from what I remember.Mon Cal ships are better pound-for-pound than an ISD because they have stronger shielding and better damage control. Additionally, Viscounts are more massive than an Executor-class.For round 2 (assuming the 'standard compliments' from Wookpedia) it becomes even more unbalanced because each Alliance fightercraft far outclass Sienar-spam, particularly in an anti-ship role. If each Executor is loaded with an absurd number of strike craft like Blastboats or TIE Bombers, they might win, otherwise not.